From: Renato S. <br....@gm...> - 2013-10-21 01:21:17
|
And you could SBFA. Interesting, you prefer waste your time with "stupid" questions than just ignoring. We all know why. On 20/10/13 21:28, Kirk Joppy wrote: >> You are breaking all the rules of argument ordering; for about the >> gadzillionth time, this is IMPORTANT! Object files MUST be specified >> BEFORE the library files on which they depend. It has been so since the >> dawn of the Unix epoch, yet far too many people continue to get this wrong! > > You know, it's not that everyone is stupid. This detail only ever > comes up on mailing lists and usually as an answer to a question with > an unrelated title. Thus nobody ever finds this information. Such was > the case with me at first. Figuring out why linking fails is far from > clear for anyone new to the tools. Oh, come now. That's a thoroughly lame excuse. You could RTFM: http://bit.ly/16p2Lfp Or just: http://bit.ly/16p2j0t -- Regards, Keith. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ MinGW-users mailing list Min...@li... This list observes the Etiquette found at http://www.mingw.org/Mailing_Lists. We ask that you be polite and do the same. Disregard for the list etiquette may cause your account to be moderated. _______________________________________________ You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users Also: mailto:min...@li...?subject=unsubscribe |