From: Earnie B. <ea...@us...> - 2013-03-30 16:39:41
|
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:57 AM, LRN wrote: > That's actually a good advice (pity i didn't get it, like, 2 years > ago...), compatible with my view of how MSYS and MinGW fit together. > Maybe we should ask config.guess maintainer to completely remove mingw > and msys bits from config.guess (since, as pointed out already, > current guess method consists of, basically, hard-coding 32-bit > mingw.org toolchain or 32-bit msys-only toolchain), and rely solely > upon config.site? Uh, not only no, but hell no. That will not happen! Config.guess is just a programmed script based on the values it receives from uname -s. It has a maintained upstream repository that can be adjusted. Usually the maintainer of that script has a difficult time in knowing exactly who and what should be adjusting a particular piece. However, I do watch for changes and will pitch a hissy fit at such a change! -- Earnie -- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd |