From: Erwin W. <wat...@xs...> - 2012-09-07 07:45:13
|
Op 7-9-2012 9:18, Keith Marshall schreef: > On 07/09/12 07:24, Erwin Waterlander wrote: >> Hi Keith, >> >> I think you forgot to run an "mingw-get update" before you changed the >> xml files. > Why would I? It is irrelevant. I did an hg clone from the new git > repository, (which, at the time should have been 100% consistent with > the old CVS content). > >> I just noticed that dos2unix has been set back to version 5.3.3. > Then, I guess that the changes for your newer version didn't get pushed > to CVS, (or latterly to the git origin repository). Perhaps I followed the wrong procedure. I always uploaded the files directly to the catalogue in the Files section. Should I have used CVS in the past? > >> I will re-upload the latest xml files with the double name removed. > That, alone, is not sufficient. We need to ensure that *all* future > updates get pushed to the new git repository; this is now the *sole* > determinant of the current distribution state. You mean that all files under the Files section are first pushed to git, and then automatically synced to Files? How does it work? > > Earnie, should we not grant Erwin git push access for mingw-dist? > > -- Erwin Waterlander http://waterlan.home.xs4all.nl/ |