From: Keith M. <kei...@us...> - 2010-04-26 19:44:19
|
On Wednesday 21 April 2010 01:13:07 Charles Wilson wrote: > >> [where to maintain one-big-xml, or many-smaller-xml] > >> > >> CVS? > > > > That would be my choice; however, we do need to agree how the > > modules layout should be structured. > > Seems like a single directory, with individual files for each set > of packages derived from the same source lineage, would be > workable. I was thinking of how we want to organise the CVS repository. I don't think that these package-specific manifests belong in the source tree for mingw-get, since they relate more to *other* packages -- those which they describe. Maybe a flat directory at cvsroot level, to store them all, and use the CVSROOT/modules database to organise them into package specific subsets? > Merging closely related groups together wouldn't hurt, > either. I might combine all of the automakeX.Y collections (and > the am-wrapper) into one big mingw-automake.xml; ditto > mingw-autoconfX.Y and the ac-wrapper. As the maintainer of those package sets, that will be your call; such a combination would make sense to me. Naturally, I will be on hand to offer advice, if you require it. -- Regards, Keith. |