From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2009-01-18 05:16:57
|
Bugs item #2501895, was opened at 2009-01-13 06:23 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by dannysmith You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=102435&aid=2501895&group_id=2435 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: gcc >Group: Known bugs Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: ber_44 (ber_44) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: internal compiler error in rest_of_handle_final Initial Comment: OS: Vista SP 1. Reading specs from C:/MinGW/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/3.4.2/specs Configured with: ../gcc/configure --with-gcc --with-gnu-ld --with-gnu-as --host= mingw32 --target=mingw32 --prefix=/mingw --enable-threads --disable-nls --enable -languages=c,c++,f77,ada,objc,java --disable-win32-registry --disable-shared --e nable-sjlj-exceptions --enable-libgcj --disable-java-awt --without-x --enable-ja va-gc=boehm --disable-libgcj-debug --enable-interpreter --enable-hash-synchroniz ation --enable-libstdcxx-debug Thread model: win32 gcc version 3.4.2 (mingw-special) GNU ld version 2.15.91 20040904 shell: cmd.exe When trying to compile latest open-source version of Nokia Qt with options C:\Qt\4.4.3\configure.exe -static -qt-libmng -qt-libjpeg -qt-libpng -debug-and-release -fast you will see that MinGW S**KS: g++ -c -include tmp\obj\debug_static\qt_pch.h -g -Wall -frtti -fexceptions -mthr eads -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -DUNICODE -DQT_LARGEFILE_SUPPORT -DQT_BUILD_CORE_LIB -D QT_NO_USING_NAMESPACE -DQT_ASCII_CAST_WARNINGS -DQT3_SUPPORT -DQT_MOC_COMPAT -D_ USE_MATH_DEFINES -DHB_EXPORT=Q_CORE_EXPORT -I"..\..\include" -I"..\..\include\Qt Core" -I"tmp\rcc\debug_static" -I"tmp" -I"concurrent" -I"global" -I"..\3rdparty\ zlib" -I"..\3rdparty\harfbuzz\src" -I"c:\Qt\4.4.3\include\ActiveQt" -I"tmp\moc\d ebug_static" -I"." -I"..\..\include" -I"c:\MinGW\include" -I"..\..\mkspecs\win32 -g++" -o tmp\obj\debug_static\qfutureinterface.o concurrent\qfutureinterface.cpp concurrent\qfutureinterface.cpp: In constructor `QFutureInterfaceBase::QFutureIn terfaceBase(QFutureInterfaceBase::State)': concurrent\qfutureinterface.cpp:58: internal compiler error: in rest_of_handle_f inal, at toplev.c:2064 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See <URL:http://www.mingw.org/bugs.shtml> for instructions. mingw32-make[3]: *** [tmp/obj/debug_static/qfutureinterface.o] Error 1 mingw32-make[3]: Leaving directory `C:/Qt/4.4.3/src/corelib' mingw32-make[2]: *** [debug-all] Error 2 mingw32-make[2]: Leaving directory `C:/Qt/4.4.3/src/corelib' mingw32-make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 mingw32-make[1]: Leaving directory `C:/Qt/4.4.3/src/corelib' mingw32-make: *** [sub-corelib-sub_src_target_ordered] Error 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Danny Smith (dannysmith) Date: 2009-01-18 18:16 Message: It has been fixed http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=+23589+ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Keith Marshall (keithmarshall) Date: 2009-01-13 08:45 Message: Hear, hear. I was going to say that MinGW may not be perfect, but if anything really sucks here, it is the OP's reading ability. Where was the requested minimal test case? Where was the requested preprocessed source? Did you get the message yet? As tdragon says, if you piss us off with uncivilised derogatory language, you are unlikely to get a helpful, and possibly a less than civilised response. No one is going to even look into such reports, without proper supporting documentation. I fully concur with his decision to close this, without further attention. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John E. (tdragon) Date: 2009-01-13 08:15 Message: 1. You aren't using the latest stable MinGW releases of GCC and binutils. 2. Please don't use derogatory language in posting to this project's trackers or forums. It makes it much more likely for you to be ignored (or blacklisted), and, since developers don't like to have their hard work disparaged, negates any possible benefit of the post or report. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=102435&aid=2501895&group_id=2435 |