From: JonY <10...@gm...> - 2008-12-10 15:05:30
|
On 12/10/2008 20:45, Tor Lillqvist wrote: >> I am not sure, what the difference is. I never took a look on pexports. I >> assume it is the support of 64-bit dlls, > > Well, some months back on this very list I announced an "unofficial" > (in the sense that I don't want to be seen as being a maintainer of > it) enhancement to pexports that added support for 64-bit PEs. > > That said, pexports had grown some irrelevant (IMHO) cruft at some > stage (the possibility to scan header files for function declarations, > brrr), and as your gendef is cleaner, concentrates on one task only, > and actually maintained, I am all for it! > > --tml > Hi, gendef seems to add the @<n> part automatically, is that by design? Something doesn't look right for some functions though. DLL is msvcrt.dll, output from "diff -u gendef_output pexports_output". .... -_cwait@12 +_cwait .... .... -_mbctombb@19316 +_mbctombb .... .... -_findnext@4234 +_findnext _cwait shouldn't have stdcall decorations according mingw process.h. Overall, it still needs some fixing. Keep up the good work! |