From: Aurimas Č. <au...@gm...> - 2008-10-13 11:01:31
|
Hi, >> would make it essentially impossible for gcc to support threaded apps on >> Windows 95/98/ME without memory leaks because the non-NT versions of > > And, just for the record: Personally I don't have any problem with > dropping Win 9x/ME support entirely, after all Microsoft has long ago > done as much. But my impression -- and this may be totally unfounded -- > is that there are still some people out there who would like to use > MinGW to maintain apps that still run on dinosaurs. Maybe we just say > that if you want to do that you stick to the existing stable versions > that use the mingwm10.dll method. I think GCC4 doesn't work on Win9x. At least it didn't some time ago. If so, than dropping support for Win9x is already half-done. -- Aurimas |