From: Earnie B. <ea...@us...> - 2008-09-03 11:45:31
|
Quoting "Aaron W. LaFramboise" <aar...@aa...>: > Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >>> we'd already be making a pretty radical change by abandoning >>> the old way and following a new schema, so this would be a good >>> time IMO to drop the leading 'mingw-' from >>> mingw-runtime-3.15-mingw32-dev.tar.gz >>> and just use the simpler >>> runtime-3.15-mingw32-dev.tar.gz >>> instead. >> >> Fair enough, seems like we have consensus on a new naming convention. > > I don't want to add any confusion to the 'naming things' fray, where > everyone has an opinion, but... > My bikeshed is red and not blue. I agree 100% with Aaron for the same reasons Aaron gives. The name runtime-3.15 is too vague outside of MinGW. The names mingw-runtime-3.15 or mingwrt-3.15 are what I would suggest. Earnie |