Re: [MinGW-dvlpr] build availability question

[Aaron W. L. <aar...@aa...>]

Brandon Sneed wrote:

> 2. host a build on the SF mingw project, send msg to the user-list.   
> what would the title be?  "Feedback Requested:  GDB-Test-6.X-20080417"  
> at sf.net?

This is the best thing to do, and this is the whole purpose of the 
'proposed' and 'release' candidate system MinGW has been using.

Unless someone else feels otherwise, I would suggest maintaining two 
sets of releases, one you feel is release-quality, and the other that's 
alpha/beta where you'd like additional testing, similar to binutils and GCC.