From: e h. <eh...@ma...> - 2002-10-01 12:59:54
|
> > > > Should they not put that on the documentation on the mingw homepage? > > > > oi. I assumed that whatever code they had up there was correct. > > > > > > It has nothing to do with MinGW. It's C++. The ISO standard is out > > > there since 1998. With relation to 'std' namespace, g++ comes with a > > > standards compliant library since version 3.0. > > > > Oscar, he was referring to the example C++ code on the Mingw Documentation > > page, which is incorrect. > > Sorry, I didn't realized that. > > However, I wonder how he uses the Borland C++ compiler without facing > the same problem, unless is a really old version. My experience with Borland was entirely inside the framework of AP Comp Sci in high school - '98-'99. As I recall, our software wasn't right off the shelf, either. Afterwards I switched to Java, then to C, and haven't touched C++ until recently when the team I'm on required our code be done in C++. |