From: Christopher F. <cg...@re...> - 2002-09-03 01:13:00
|
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 03:17:37PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Anyway, I've gone to some considerable effort to improve -mno-cygwin. >>No reason for you to believe me but there's also no reason for you to >>continue to misrepresent the state of -mno-cygwin since things have >>changed and your information is now obsolete. >> >>>Sorry, too much negative personal experience with cygwin on my side > >Can this discussion about -mno-cygwin be moved to the Cygwin list? >FWIW, MinGW doesn't support -mno-cygwin. Certainly. Sorry for the noise. cgf |