From: Federico F. <fed...@di...> - 2002-06-25 10:59:00
|
Where can I find information about rebuilding the library as a DLL? On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 20:04, Oscar Fuentes wrote: > "Stephen M. Webb" <ste...@cr...> writes: > > > > I think it should be solved in libstdc++, don't you? > > > > The problem is really in the way DLLs resolve symbols. > > > > The final alternative is to go the route followed by Microsoft and link > > the standard library dynamically. If libstdc++ was built as a DLL and > > distributed with your DLL, the problem should go away. > > I know it's possible (at least for 2.95.x) to rebuild the library as a > dll, as explained elsewhere, but why it is not distributed it with the > MinGW package? > > > You run the risk of going through DLL hell that way. > > The alternative is not using C++ DLL's at all. > > -- > Oscar > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Sponsored by: > ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ > _______________________________________________ > MinGW-users mailing list > Min...@li... > > You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users |