From: F. <j_r...@ya...> - 2002-05-30 01:19:48
|
On 2002.05.30 01:20 Andres Rand wrote: > ... > My theory goes: > Older software products are better than new ones. > For backing up my theory, take for example Linux. How many bugs it had > in "childhood" and how many it has now?? My OS installing was all about > upgrading from Win98 to Win2k. Not XP as MS and many users suggest. I > think 2-2.5 years of bug-hunt and development is enough for somewhat > stable run on Win system. > With that, I think I will install XP on Christmas 2004 or in 2005 ;) > ... Your theory is full of contradictions, as yourself... Why bother upgrade at all if you don't believe in quality enhancement!? Regarding your "childish" comment regarding the Linux bugs evolution: have you ever considered that many missing features _are_ a bug? Such as "not working on my brand new 4 SMP motherboard"? José Fonseca PS: I really shouldn't answer to trolls but it feels nice to take the bait once in a while... |