From: <je...@i3...> - 2002-03-07 23:49:58
|
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Timothy J. Wood wrote: > I should have been more clear -- when there is a snapshot for 3.1 that > works with MinGW as a target, then I can check it out. Does this > already work on the head of CVS? I have found it to work from time to time. There are problems, but that's why 3.1 isn't yet ready for release, after all. But what if you wait for the release and discover it's broken? For those who want a quality 3.1 release, there is a little bit of urgency now. Incidentally Apple has been working to merge their forked version of GCC. It takes a lot of time and resources to maintain forced sources (or a patchkit, as mingw has done in the past). The GCC project's resources are available for anyone interested in helping with a port. That includes mingw. > I'm already building a Darwin version > of gcc 3.1 (although this is from the Darwin GCC repository), so > building it isn't a problem -- I just don't want to take the time to try > to fiddle with the ObjC bits until the basic C bits are working :) The basic C bits ought to work (did the last time I tried). There may be problems with c++, java support is getting close, and I have no idea about ObjC. Jeff |