Re: [Mingw-users] Correct way to contribute to w32api

[TAMURA K. <ke...@ha...>]

Thanks for replys.

> > > main()
> > > {
> > >         printf("%i", WIN32_VERY_IMPORTANT_MACRO);
> > > }

> > This can be construed to be reverse engineering.
> Even if it is: in a country where the UCITA law has no effect, analyzing
> the output of a system given a input, albeit considered reverse
> engineering, is not a crime. That's how many open-source projects have
> made so far.

Ok, this is not illegal outside UCITA, isn't it?  If the
concrete value of a macro is only in PSDK headers, this seems
the only way to know it.

PSDK documents have complete definitions of some structures.  We
can refer to PSDK documents to add definitions for w32api, right?

-- 
TAMURA Kent <ke...@ha...> <ke...@ne...>