From: Robert M. <rob...@gm...> - 2012-11-09 21:34:26
|
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Damien Regad <dam...@me...> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Paul Richards <pa...@ma...> wrote: >> 8000 line diff = 'security and small bug fixes' ? > > Paul, > > Just to avoid making a mountain out of an anthill, note that the actual > change in MantisBT core is not that significant. If you break it down by > what was changed, only 40% (3200 lines) is our code - 30% of which are > related to soap. > > Category Lines > > Code > mantis 993 > core plugins 206 > soap 2086 > > library 2679 (new version of phpmailer) > > Others > translations 1567 > documentation 572 Just curious, how did you find so many changes in the soap API? Really, I didn't rewrite it yet :-) $ git diff --dirstat release-1.2.11.. 20.8% core/ 9.0% docbook/administration_guide/en/ 32.5% lang/ 21.7% library/phpmailer/ 5.0% plugins/ But I agree that there don't seem to be any ground-breaking changes, at least not by code size. Robert > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov > _______________________________________________ > mantisbt-dev mailing list > man...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev -- Sent from my (old) computer |
From: Damien R. <dam...@me...> - 2012-11-09 22:25:47
|
On 09.11.2012 22:34, Robert Munteanu wrote: > Just curious, how did you find so many changes in the soap API? > Really, I didn't rewrite it yet :-) You're right of course, sorry - bad copy/paste... mantis 2850 soap 258 |
From: Damien R. <dam...@me...> - 2012-11-10 16:45:18
|
On 08.11.2012 00:44, Damien Regad wrote: > On 07.11.2012 21:58, Robert Munteanu wrote: >> Since I'm waiting for the 1.2.12 release to merge back my SOAP >> changes, is there anything we're still missing to start the release >> process? > > I'm almost there. Was actually hoping to finalize things last week-end, > but got sidetracked. If all goes well, everything should be ready to go > by end of this week. > > I already prepared the release notes & stuff - > https://github.com/dregad/mantisbt/commits/1.2.12 I have completed my testing and merged all changes to my local 1.2.x branch (a few commits have not yet been ported to master, but I can do that later on). Unless anyone objects, I'll prepare the release later tonight, following the guidelines in the wiki [1], taking the opportunity to review the process. There are some steps that I don't have privileges to do myself though (Sourceforge and Notification sections), so I'll need John and/or Victor to finish the work (or give me the required access/passwords). Damien [1] http://www.mantisbt.org/wiki/doku.php/mantisbt:release_process |
From: Damien R. <dam...@me...> - 2012-11-11 01:35:21
|
Victor / John, I have prepared the release and executed all the steps I could. Please do the SourceForge update and Notifications as I don't have access to do that. The release files built by the script are available in http://mantisbt.org/files (/srv/www/files) As it's the first time I'm doing this, I would appreciate if you could sanity-check my work. I also took the time to update/improve the release process documented on the wiki [1]. I would appreciate if you could take the time to review and comment on my changes, especially where I added notes marked [dregad] Damien [1] http://www.mantisbt.org/wiki/doku.php/mantisbt:release_process |
From: Victor B. <vi...@fu...> - 2012-11-11 18:01:07
|
I've found a bug with anonymous access. I've checked in the fix. I suggest we include this in 1.2.12. http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=15200 https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/commit/d67c25724b409d79cdfe88f2381155b211eca277 If you agree, please re-package and I'll publish. On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Damien Regad <dam...@me...>wrote: > Victor / John, > > I have prepared the release and executed all the steps I could. Please > do the SourceForge update and Notifications as I don't have access to do > that. > > The release files built by the script are available in > http://mantisbt.org/files (/srv/www/files) > > As it's the first time I'm doing this, I would appreciate if you could > sanity-check my work. > > I also took the time to update/improve the release process documented on > the wiki [1]. I would appreciate if you could take the time to review > and comment on my changes, especially where I added notes marked [dregad] > > Damien > > [1] http://www.mantisbt.org/wiki/doku.php/mantisbt:release_process > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov > _______________________________________________ > mantisbt-dev mailing list > man...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev > |
From: Damien R. <dam...@me...> - 2012-11-11 22:35:54
|
On 11.11.2012 19:01, Victor Boctor wrote: > I've found a bug with anonymous access. I've checked in the fix. I > suggest we include this in 1.2.12. > > http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=15200 > https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/commit/d67c25724b409d79cdfe88f2381155b211eca277 > > If you agree, please re-package and I'll publish. Thanks for testing and fixing that issue, shame I (or anyone else) didn't detect it before I completed preparation of the release. I agree that it's serious enough to warrant its inclusion it in 1.2.12. Now speaking of tagging and re-packaging, what should I do with the 'release-1.2.12' tag ? Update it ? In theory, once something's been publicly released it shouldn't be changed... The alternative would be to create a 'release-1.2.12a' tag. Please advise. D |
From: Victor B. <vi...@fu...> - 2012-11-11 22:41:09
|
I've done this once before where I moved the tag since the release was never publicly released. However, you can argue that forks of mantisbt may use the old tag, however, they are not used for release MantisBT. btw, I also updated the wiki page to address some of the points you highlighted and to update the process for updating the official and demo bugtrackers. On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Damien Regad <dam...@me...>wrote: > On 11.11.2012 19:01, Victor Boctor wrote: > > I've found a bug with anonymous access. I've checked in the fix. I > > suggest we include this in 1.2.12. > > > > http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=15200 > > > https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/commit/d67c25724b409d79cdfe88f2381155b211eca277 > > > > If you agree, please re-package and I'll publish. > > Thanks for testing and fixing that issue, shame I (or anyone else) > didn't detect it before I completed preparation of the release. I agree > that it's serious enough to warrant its inclusion it in 1.2.12. > > Now speaking of tagging and re-packaging, what should I do with the > 'release-1.2.12' tag ? Update it ? In theory, once something's been > publicly released it shouldn't be changed... The alternative would be to > create a 'release-1.2.12a' tag. Please advise. > > D > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov > _______________________________________________ > mantisbt-dev mailing list > man...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev > |
From: Damien R. <dam...@me...> - 2012-11-11 23:35:25
|
On 11.11.2012 23:41, Victor Boctor wrote: > btw, I also updated the wiki page to address some of the points you > highlighted and to update the process for updating the official and demo > bugtrackers. > Cheers, and sorry about messing with the setup... I did not realize they were in fact git repos so I followed the upgrade process I put in place at work, which is more-or-less aligned on the instructions in the Admin Guide. I've just completed repackaging, after updating the tag per your recommendation. *** EVERYONE IS HEREBY ADVISED TO RUN git fetch --tags *** on their local repo (you have been warned) You shall find the updated release files in same location as before. I also reset both trackers to the revised release-1.2.12 tag for consistency |
From: Victor B. <vi...@fu...> - 2012-11-12 01:41:27
|
Thanks Damien. I've requested upgrade of MantisBT project site on SourceForge. This will result in changing some urls. Once it is done, I'll update the website and upload the 1.2.12 release. I thought it would be a good time to get this out of the way before a release is published and users are actively downloading the upgrade. Will update the thread once the release is published. On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Damien Regad <dam...@me...>wrote: > On 11.11.2012 23:41, Victor Boctor wrote: > > btw, I also updated the wiki page to address some of the points you > > highlighted and to update the process for updating the official and demo > > bugtrackers. > > > > Cheers, and sorry about messing with the setup... I did not realize they > were in fact git repos so I followed the upgrade process I put in place > at work, which is more-or-less aligned on the instructions in the Admin > Guide. > > I've just completed repackaging, after updating the tag per your > recommendation. > > *** EVERYONE IS HEREBY ADVISED TO RUN git fetch --tags > *** on their local repo (you have been warned) > > You shall find the updated release files in same location as before. > > I also reset both trackers to the revised release-1.2.12 tag for > consistency > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov > _______________________________________________ > mantisbt-dev mailing list > man...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev > |
From: Victor B. <vi...@fu...> - 2012-11-12 02:07:00
|
Sourceforge project site upgraded (though I don't see much difference). Blog updated. Twitter updated. Website was already updated. http://www.mantisbt.org/blog/?p=232 Let me know if I missed anything. On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Victor Boctor <vi...@fu...>wrote: > Thanks Damien. I've requested upgrade of MantisBT project site on > SourceForge. This will result in changing some urls. Once it is done, > I'll update the website and upload the 1.2.12 release. I thought it would > be a good time to get this out of the way before a release is published and > users are actively downloading the upgrade. > > Will update the thread once the release is published. > > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Damien Regad <dam...@me... > > wrote: > >> On 11.11.2012 23:41, Victor Boctor wrote: >> > btw, I also updated the wiki page to address some of the points you >> > highlighted and to update the process for updating the official and demo >> > bugtrackers. >> > >> >> Cheers, and sorry about messing with the setup... I did not realize they >> were in fact git repos so I followed the upgrade process I put in place >> at work, which is more-or-less aligned on the instructions in the Admin >> Guide. >> >> I've just completed repackaging, after updating the tag per your >> recommendation. >> >> *** EVERYONE IS HEREBY ADVISED TO RUN git fetch --tags >> *** on their local repo (you have been warned) >> >> You shall find the updated release files in same location as before. >> >> I also reset both trackers to the revised release-1.2.12 tag for >> consistency >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. >> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics >> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov >> _______________________________________________ >> mantisbt-dev mailing list >> man...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev >> > > |