Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 0.4.0

[<st...@ne...>]

Hi,

> Do you have trouble with ALL
> 0.3.xsongs?  I can load some of mine, but not others.

I tested only three projects. I will test some others soon.


>> 3) In the triple oscillator dialog, the font size of the labels of "freq
>> x100" and "mod-env" buttons is too big.
>
>
> Yeah, and in a few other plugins, the layout is messed up.  I think we are
> saving this as an exercise for when we split the UI from the instruments.

Good idea.

>
> 4) The layout of knobs in the "Controls" dialog of an effect plugin is....
> ?
>> Not done yet maybe :)
>>
>
> I'm not sure what you are referring to.

In the instrument window, in the effects tab, all plugins have a
"Controls" button to show a window with the knobs to control value for
plugin. I am talking of the layout of this second window. I test two
plugins, each time I was only able to touch one of the plugin knobs. The
bottom right one maybe.
I guess all this layout issues should be fixed after the UI/Instrument
separation but in revision 576, ladspa plugins are not usable at all.

>
>
>> 5) I confirm the UI is "very" slow, so slow than it can quickly become
>> unusable, I hope you will find a solution to this. It seems to be a
>> wired
>> and hard to resolve issue :/
>
>
> Good - I'm not the only one then.  Could you look at the output of the
> "top"
> command in the shell? Particularly with it sorted by CPU (use the '<' and
> '>' keys to choose column to sort by)?
> What is CPU usage like for "lmms" and for "X"/"XOrg"?  Is it still
> terrible
> even with a 'New' project? What about after you start removing
> instruments?
>

Already did a quick top but I've been too lazy to go further and report,
because I thought it wouldn't be helpful :)

I have the lmms process at 10% and X always very solicited, maybe 60-90%...

I'll do some other test later,

Have a nice evening.

Stéphane