Re: [LMMS-devel] CFLAGS change

[Javier S. P. <ja...@te...>]

El dl 26 de 03 del 2007 a les 23:41 +0200, en/na Tobias Doerffel va
escriure:
> > The CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS change in the last revision is unintentional, isn't
> > it?
> This one overrides optimization-flags with our own. I don't know whether this 
> helps, so we can also revert this change, no problem ;-)

Precisely, it overrides user flags. That means no debugging, force
optimization. I'll revert this.

> Concerning PolyLB302: is there a way to use more common code from lb302 and 
> only implement the actual differences between these two plugins? I guess it's 
> very hard to keep those two plugins synchronous... Furthermore I generally 
> dislike redundancy like this... ;)

Me too, but a fork was the best choice left. It isn't that hard to port
changes from lb to polyb, though don't expect a "backport". Anyway, I
need a lb302 update to assess the effort.

Bye.