Re: [LMMS-devel] Some Ideas

[<al...@ia...>]

Hello,

I suppose it is related to that, in a way. I find automating the linear
scale just fine, but Sometimes I don't need to have the filter set all the
way to 11000 Hz. When I'm automating a filter on a 303-like bassline or
something, I only want the filter to be between 50 Hz and 1000 Hz. With
LMMS' current automation setup, that kind of automation can be very
difficult.

Speaking of automation, I found that if the time signature is set to 3/4,
the automation editor still shows measures that are 4 beats long.

--alex

Also, I use Windows mostly because I use Adobe Flash and switching back and
forth between Linux and Windows can be very troublesome. My Linux
installation is also somewhat unstable, so using it can be a pain. Because
I use Windows, I can't help with the development of LMMS (I don't think I
could, either), but I can help with Documentation, if you don't mind.

On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:26:00 +0100, en...@in... wrote:
> Hi Alex, thank you for your ideas.
> 
> About filtering: is what you propose linked to the fact that it is
> difficult to automate filters with linear scale - that is 0 100 200 300
> ....1000 1100...2000 2100...? It is rather a known problem, frequency
> scale would behave probably better if it would be logaritmically spaced
> (equispaced knob movement between [10  100] and [100 1000] for example:
> as you will notice the difference between 10000 Hz and 11000 Hz is
> almost unhearable, while the difference between 1000 and 2000 is always
> 1000 but it's much more hearable). Skiessi, any news about that?
> 
> Enrico
> 
> Alex Iadicicco ha scritto:
>> LMMS Developers,
>>
>> I'm a big fan of LMMS. I truly enjoy using LMMS for making all sorts of
>> music. You can hear some of the stuff I've made at theta4.newgrounds.com
>>
>> BUT, because I've been using LMMS for a while, I've gotten some ideas. I
>> didn't know where to put them, so I figured I'd send an email to this
> list.
>>
>> The three I would like to see most are:
>>
>> - Automation range options, where the user can select the highest and
>> lowest values an automation can be. This one is good for filters, when
> I'd
>> rather automate from 200 Hz to 3 kHz on a filter, rather than the
> default 0
>> Hz to 14 kHz.
>> - Pitch envelope
>> - Something that allows the user to select any control and make it a
>> per-note property (like pan and velocity are in 0.4.2)
>>
>> Thank you for your consideration. Also, I'll probably get more ideas in
> the
>> future, so if I shouldn't email my ideas to this list, I'd appreciate if
>> someone could tell me where I should be sending my ideas.
>>
>> --alex
>>
>>
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> LMMS-devel mailing list
>> LMM...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
>>
>>
>>