From: Jarek C. <jar...@po...> - 2012-03-02 06:55:20
|
Kazutoshi, thank you for the thorough analysis. I think I agree with all of it. But we need to have the names defined in a single place in javadoc. In one of the public classes. If you would like me to do a part of this naming job, let me know. Old code needn't necessarily be changed or commented, I think it's too much fuss. But new methods and stuff that is touched anyway could use the precise naming, whenever possible. Summarizing we should state to use the following terms: code unit (alternatively "java char", simply referred as "char" in old code) code point glyph user char char or character is a misleading term, thus deprecated. Usually it means character as defined in Java, which we can't fight. Jarek |