From: Eric B. <el...@gm...> - 2009-06-29 06:28:11
|
I love this idea! +1 from me! On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Alan Ezust <ala...@gm...> wrote: > Slightly related to an earlier thread about modes being supplied by > plugins, > I think that plugins should also be able to provide actions that are > specified as > beanshell macros (or perhaps macros in any of the supported macro > languages), > instead of being forced to put code in an XML file. > > If a plugin provides these scripts in a "macros" directory, I think that > each of these scripts should be added as an action to the actionset of that > plugin, as if it was appearing between <code> and </code> elements in the > actions.xml. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > ----------------------------------------------- > jEdit Developers' List > jEd...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-devel > > -- Learn from the past. Live in the present. Plan for the future. 11101000 http://www.townsfolkdesigns.com/blogs/elberry |