Re: [ jEdit-users ] Jane StackOverflowError--FIXED

[RR <sec...@gm...>]

Completely understand. The state we have it in is sufficient for our
current needs (though I'd like to muck with the caching a bit for
better use with our code generating tools). Thanks for the help, Dirk!

-RR-


On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 09:30:38 +0100, Dirk M=F6bius <dmo...@gm...> wrote:
> Hi RR,
>=20
> yeah I now. I left CodeAid at a totally unstable stage. It's work in prog=
ress.
> Sorry, I should have said it at the first time.
>=20
> I am currently uncertain whether I should continue development on CodeAid=
, or
> if all those efforts are hopeless. True code completion is much too
> complicated to be done by a single person at midnight once a week. I am n=
ot
> IBM developing Eclipse.
>=20
> Tomorrow I'll make an announcement on the mailing list about the current
> problems.
>=20
> Dirk.
>=20
> On Friday 18 March 2005 05:24, RR wrote:
> > Grabbed the source tonight and built both CodeAid and Jane. However,
> > Jane only built after I changed some lines in BCELClassParser
> > regarding ClassNotFoundExceptions. I then built CodeAid. It's obvious
> > from looking at the code that *a lot* has changed. Even so, I cannot
> > get CodeAid to function properly in 4.2 or 4.3pre1. I continued to
> > receive the following exception every time invoking CodeAid:
> >
> > java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError
> >  at
> > codeaid.completion.CompletionContext.prepareJaneContext(CompletionConte=
xt.j
> >ava:102) at
> > codeaid.completion.CompletionContext.<init>(CompletionContext.java:94) =
at
> > codeaid.popup.ContextPopup.addCompletionContext(ContextPopup.java:95) a=
t
> > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> >  at
> > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.ja=
va:3
> >9) at
> > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccesso=
rImp
> >l.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
> >  at bsh.Reflect.invokeOnMethod(Reflect.java:149)
> >  at bsh.Reflect.invokeObjectMethod(Reflect.java:81)
> >  at bsh.BSHPrimarySuffix.doName(BSHPrimarySuffix.java:169)
> >  at bsh.BSHPrimarySuffix.doSuffix(BSHPrimarySuffix.java:120)
> >  at bsh.BSHPrimaryExpression.eval(BSHPrimaryExpression.java:80)
> >  at bsh.BSHPrimaryExpression.eval(BSHPrimaryExpression.java:47)
> >  at bsh.BSHBlock.evalBlock(BSHBlock.java:130)
> >  at bsh.BSHBlock.eval(BSHBlock.java:80)
> >  at bsh.BshMethod.invokeImpl(BshMethod.java:349)
> >  at bsh.BshMethod.invoke(BshMethod.java:246)
> >  at bsh.BshMethod.invoke(BshMethod.java:171)
> >  at org.gjt.sp.jedit.BeanShell.runCachedBlock(BeanShell.java:507)
> >  at org.gjt.sp.jedit.BeanShellAction.invoke(BeanShellAction.java:76)
> >  at org.gjt.sp.jedit.gui.InputHandler.invokeAction(InputHandler.java:22=
9)
> >  at org.gjt.sp.jedit.gui.InputHandler.invokeAction(InputHandler.java:19=
5)
> >  at
> > org.gjt.sp.jedit.gui.DefaultInputHandler.handleKey(DefaultInputHandler.=
java
> >:385) at org.gjt.sp.jedit.View.processKeyEvent(View.java:678)
> >  at
> > org.gjt.sp.jedit.textarea.JEditTextArea.processKeyEvent(JEditTextArea.j=
ava:
> >4712) at java.awt.Component.processEvent(Component.java:4909)
> >  at java.awt.Container.processEvent(Container.java:1569)
> >  at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:3615)
> >  at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:1627)
> >  at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:3477)
> >  at
> > java.awt.KeyboardFocusManager.redispatchEvent(KeyboardFocusManager.java=
:171
> >3) at
> > java.awt.DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.dispatchKeyEvent(DefaultKeyboardFo=
cusM
> >anager.java:627) at
> > java.awt.DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.preDispatchKeyEvent(DefaultKeyboar=
dFoc
> >usManager.java:831) at
> > java.awt.DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.typeAheadAssertions(DefaultKeyboar=
dFoc
> >usManager.java:741) at
> > java.awt.DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.dispatchEvent(DefaultKeyboardFocus=
Mana
> >ger.java:592) at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:350=
6)
> >  at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:1627)
> >  at java.awt.Window.dispatchEventImpl(Window.java:1606)
> >  at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:3477)
> >  at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:456)
> >  at
> > java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForHierarchy(EventDispatchThre=
ad.j
> >ava:201) at
> > java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread=
.jav
> >a:151) at
> > java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:145) a=
t
> > java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:137) a=
t
> > java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:100)
> >
> > -RR-
> >
> > On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:13:50 +0100 (MET), Dirk Moebius <dmo...@gm...=
t>
> wrote:
> > > Hi RR,
> > >
> > > > I love CodeAid and I love Jane because I want code completion * fro=
m
> > > > the source *. I don"t want to rebuild every dang time some code
> > > > changes, and it"s royal pain with some code generating tools we hav=
e.
> > > > I"m a JEdit convert, and I brought up the situation to the guy who
> > > > converted me. He was interested in similar functionality. BUT, Jane
> > > > has a nasty recursion issue when the last element of a sourcepath o=
r
> > > > classpath is identical. We grabbed the latest Jane source (from the
> > > > plugin manager)
> > >
> > > The latest source is not available from the plugin manager, but from =
the
> > > jEdit CVS repository. The code in plugins/Jane and plugins/CodeAid ha=
s
> > > much evolved since the last year. I fixed thousands of bugs. I guess,
> > > your StackOverflow problem has been fixed, too (but I'm not sure).
> > >
> > > Among the bugfixes are:
> > > - jEdit 4.2 compatibility
> > > - JDK 1.4 compatibility ('assert' keyword)
> > > - SideKick 0.3 compatibility
> > > - Code completion completes more code.
> > >
> > > The versions in CVS are CodeAid-1.0 and Jane-1.0 (not CodeAid-0.9 and
> > > Jane-0.0.1), to reflect the massive changes that have been made there=
.
> > >
> > > Nevertheless, I think even the new versions are not very usable. Ther=
e
> > > are still many issues with code completion. That's why I didn't relea=
se
> > > it yet officially on the PluginManager site.
> > >
> > > And I'm skeptical if CodeAid will ever reach a usable state, especial=
ly
> > > when it comes to JDK 1.5 compatibilty (generics).
> > >
> > > However, I suggest you try out the CVS versions. If your problem is s=
till
> > > not fixed, I invite you to check in your fixes.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Dirk.
> > >
> > > --
> > > DSL Komplett von GMX +++ Superg=FCnstig und stressfrei einsteigen!
> > > AKTION "Kein Einrichtungspreis" nutzen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real use=
rs.
> > > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D6595&alloc_id=3D14396&op=3Dclick
> > > --
> > > -----------------------------------------------
> > > jEdit Users' List
> > > jEd...@li...
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-users
>