From: Harpreet S. <hs...@fa...> - 2004-01-06 18:12:08
|
I don't mean to make a joke out of it but why not just shut it down at the end of the day. why leave it running for 5 days minimized. Yes, I know this is not the solution for the problem. Harpreet Singh hs...@fa... On 1/6/2004 12:28 PM, Doug Breaux wrote: > Right. What I'm saying, though, is that memory is creeping up even when > I'm not using jEdit at all. It's sitting minimized, and has been for > several days, but its memory footprint in Windows is increasing. If I > restore it then re-minimize it, the footprint goes back down, but it > starts gradually creeping up again. Perhaps this is normal, but I just > wanted to note it since the original poster commented that his system > was actually running out of memory if he left jEdit running. > > Doug > > Frank Zimmer wrote: > >> This is very dependant of your Java Runtime Settings, the version of >> your JVM .... >> I don't know your setting for starting jedit on windows but in the >> lower right corner you have the Java Heap >> displayed. this is something like 12/60 MB (depending on your start >> settings) >> That means that your JVM has a Maximum of 60 MB (in this example) and >> is using currently only 12 of them. >> Depending on your settings the jedit process has something between 12 >> and 60 MB Space used. >> For that example the total memory used by Jedit should not grow over >> 60 MB + some MB for the JVM itself ( >> i don't know this exact value, can be about further 10 or 15 MB) >> >> Doug Breaux wrote: >> >>> Yep. Coming back in today, jEdit is using 25 MB, again, with no >>> usage of it (or the whole computer for that matter) for 5 days. >>> >>> Doug Breaux wrote: >>> >>>> Interesting. I've left jEdit running on my work computer while I've >>>> been away today, and it does seem to be creeping up in memory. I >>>> started it up and minimized it, and Win(2K) reported its memory use >>>> dropping down to 2 MB. I just checked again, several hours later, >>>> and with jEdit staying minimized and no other user activity >>>> occurring at all on the computer, it's now up to 15 MB. I'll keep >>>> watching it. >>>> >>>> Lee Turner wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi >>>>> >>>>> I installed pre 8 on my laptop (win 2000) and on my work desktop >>>>> machine (win NT4) as soon as I saw this announcement and all seemed >>>>> to be well. I tend to keep my machines on for a while and just >>>>> sleep the laptop and lock the workstation when I am not using >>>>> them. I have now had pre 8 installed for a day and a night and I >>>>> have had a "Low on virtual memory" error on both my laptop and my >>>>> work machine. I saw the error on the laptop first last night but I >>>>> didn't think much of it as I was burning a CD while using jEdit and >>>>> I had also installed iTunes just after installing pre 8 so it could >>>>> have been that that caused the problem (my laptop has 256MB RAM). >>>>> However, I came into work this morning and my workstation had >>>>> ground to a halt and collapsed in a heap with a "Low on virtual >>>>> memory" error. I haven't seen this on my work machine before and >>>>> the only thing that had changed was I had installed pre 8. My work >>>>> machine has 512MB RAM. I thought I would post this message here to >>>>> see if anyone else had noticed anything similar ?? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> Lee > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. > Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's > Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. > Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click |