From: Sergey V. U. <ser...@cl...> - 2001-09-09 18:14:25
|
> > OK. Temporarily I changed my code to use regular JTable...:( > > Updated the docs. The version now is v_0_71. Is it OK? > I feel relieved... ;) I am glad to please you ;) > You don't give up, do you?!? ... I like that. :-) :) I'm always like this:) > - Maybe it turns out that someone does not only want to put GUI controls > there, but other framework methods specific to plugins, too. I though only about plugin for Common Controls - because I think non-gui tools will provoke "BuildTools" effect more easily. It's a bit easier to track the usage of the controls than usage of utility packages/functions/etc (because a control is used "as a whole") > - Therefore, it should be named "CommonPlugin" or "ToolsPlugin", or > simply "Common" or "Tools". If we'll decide to put only controls there? > - Subject to the chosen name, put HelpfulJTable in package "common.gui" > or "tools.gui". Will the package name common.controls be OK? OK. If I put this control, for a moment there are 2 controls used in more than 1 plugin (correct me if I wrong): HelpfulJTable, JMouseComboBox. The issue is that I can create this plugin (build.xml, CommonControls.props etc) but since I am not the author of these controls I would kindly as Dirk do continue his nice work on them - I mean mainenance, development, bugfix etc. Otherwise the whole enterprise is useless. Will it be OK for you, Dirk? Regards, Sergey |