From: Jamie L. <ja...@ea...> - 2001-04-26 16:32:01
|
i really like the way ripple shows the folding. i think its really slick and would prefer that to how jEdit currently shows them. ________________________ ///o-o\\\ Jamie LaScolea ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Locke" <ts...@uk...> To: <jed...@li...> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 12:04 PM Subject: Re: [ jEdit-devel ] Enhancing Folding > Artur > > >I think that you should try to implement some generic way of folding. > >Till now there was one folding mode - so there was no real point for > >generic programming, as exact requirements for other modes where not > >know. But now, when second folding mode comes into play, try to make it > >pluggable - so third one would be very easy after that. > > OK -- we could have a pluggable mechanism for determining where the folds are: > > * According to manually placed 'fold comments' > * Following indentation blocks > * Following parsed language constructs (methods / classes...) > > But we still have an issue to resolve - how should the folds look. > Currently there's a one pixel line for closed folds, in my suggestion > there's a one line comment. Also, in Ripple, the fold end is a text line of > it's own - i.e. it's a line that contains no text (just the fold end > comment which is hidden), it's seen when the fold is open but not when it's > closed. In jEdit the end of the fold is between lines... > > Tom. > > > > -- > ----------------------------------------------- > jEdit Developers' List > jEd...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-devel > |