From: John G. <jge...@ny...> - 2001-04-27 10:43:02
|
> --- Jeremy Wadsack <jwa...@wa...> wrote: > > > > > It would be nice to have a plug-in that would tell you the > > dependencies within > > > your project, so that you could easily know all the other > > project members that > > > call a certain part of the code. I'm imagining JBrowse, > > parsing the entire > > > project, with the ability to show "references" and > > "referenced by" classes, > > > methods, fields, macros, etc... > > > > How about javadoc? It's not a plugin, but it will tell you all > > the > > 'uses' and 'used by' for each method in every class it > > documents (in a > > session). > > The use and used by features of JavaDoc only document usage of > Java types as argument of return types. If you use a method > within another method, this is not documented by JavaDoc. The > only tool that can show all the references, referenced by, etc. > for Java code is IBM VisualAge for Java. VAJ has an incremental > compiler whenever I save a piece of code. After every change I > see directly if dependencies are broken. > I like jEdit very much as an editor, but it can't compete > against VAJ for my Java development. > > Ringo > > ===== > Ringo De Smet > Email @ home: Rin...@bi... > Email @ work: Rin...@bi... > Would VAJ be able to show broken depenedencies in non-project code like a BeanShell macro, which isn't compiled and doesn't require explicit typing? What if you adopted strict Java syntax for macros? John |