From: Cary R. <cy...@ya...> - 2010-05-19 19:21:12
|
--- On Wed, 5/19/10, Denis Daly <dd...@ca...> wrote: > Cary - do you think an SFT file might fix the problem I > am having? No, given that these are likely system task you probably don't need the SFT file. It is only used to define the return type for system functions. Why are we passing the library as both a -m and as an argument to cadpli? It looks like cadpli should be an alternative to -m not in addition to -m. If the file is not in the default vvp library path then vpip_load_module() may be generating this message when it tries to open the library. Do we need the -M flag to add the path? Cary |