From: Robert H. <en...@no...> - 2005-08-19 09:42:54
|
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 13:48 -0700, Ethan Merritt wrote: > On Thursday 18 August 2005 01:28 pm, Ga=EBl Varoquaux wrote: > >=20 > > > Personally I am in favour of the second option. Freeglut is > > > standard/available in Debian, Ubuntu, and (as I understand > > > it) Fedora/Red-hat. > >=20 > > How about my objection about library dependancies, if it makes any > > sense ? >=20 > I don't think there is a 100% solution to this problem. > Sadly, freeglut and other glut implementations are not perfectly > compatible. If you try transferring a binary linked against, > say X.org glut, to a machine that has nVidia drivers and glut libs > you are likely to crash the application, X11 itself, and possibly > the whole machine. [As I have learned the hard way]. hmm. I can't say I've had any problems myself. I'm not sure how many of the opengl apps I have use glut, but certainly things like upgrading from Xfree86 to X.org haven't caused me any issues. Anything that crashes X11 is a bug in the server. Rob --=20 Robert Hart <en...@no...> University of Nottingham This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses, which could damage your computer system: you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. |