Re: [Gdcm2] Automatically categorizing and polygonizing scanned tissue

[John D. <jdx...@go...>]

Is it the polygonization, or the tissue/organ categorization, which is the
big problem? My guess is the latter?

On 3 October 2011 14:34, Mark Roden <mm...@gm...> wrote:

> This is _extremely_ hard to do, and worthy of a couple of doctoral
> dissertations.
>
> Take a look at the MICCAI segmentation challenges (Just google for
> 'MICCAI grand segmentation challenge') to see the state of the art in
> segmenting various organs from various modalities.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 6:30 AM, John Dexter <jdx...@go...>
> wrote:
> > If I receive say a CT/MRI patient scan, how easy is it to automatically
> > identify which is the heart, skeleton, etc? And how easy is it to
> > automatically build polygonal representations from volume data? The
> latter
> > part I think one of the other toolkits might solve, but could you ever
> trust
> > a completely automated solution or would it always involve manual
> > review/optimization?
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
> > definitive record of customers, application performance, security
> > threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> > sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gdcm-developers mailing list
> > Gdc...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gdcm-developers
> >
> >
>