Re: [Audacity-quality] changes in Resample code

[Gale A. <ga...@au...>]

| From Rob Sykes <aq...@ya...> 
| Mon, 14 Jan 2013 07:35:10 +0000 (GMT)
| Subject: [Audacity-quality] changes in Resample code
> 
> 
> From: Gale Andrews <ga...@au...>
> >
> >
> >Libsamplerate has five choices in 
> >Audacity:
> >
> >ZOH Interpolator
> >Linear Interpolator 
> >Fastest Sinc Interpolator 
> >Medium Sinc Interpolator 
> >Best Sinc Interpolator 
> >
> >Do we know which of those is used for Time Track rendering and which 
> >for Time Track playback?
> >
> >Also perhaps the Manual needs to mention that to be sure which 
> >libsamplerate quality is used for Time Tracks, initialise Prefs. 
> >
> >Copy of  some info I just sent to Gale, off-list:
>  
> Here's the situation for var-rate @ r12165:
> 
> Render   Play
> libsoxrVar-rate-q* Var-rate-q*
> libresampleHigh-q sinc   Fast sinc
> libsamplerateBest sinc   Fastest sinc
> 
> * libsoxr currently has a single, dedicated quality level for var-rate resampling.

Thanks, Rob and for your testing.  

All seems clear now, except for which var-rate resampler Mac is going to 
use. 



Gale