Re: [Audacity-quality] changes in Resample code
A free multi-track audio editor and recorder
Brought to you by:
aosiniao
From: Bill W. <bi...@go...> - 2013-01-14 04:20:56
|
On 13/01/2013, at 5:41 PM, Vaughan Johnson <va...@au...> wrote: > On 1/13/2013 2:07 PM, Rob Sykes wrote: >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >>> From: Vaughan Johnson <va...@au...> >>> To: aud...@li... >>> Cc: >>> Sent: Saturday, 12 January 2013, 21:46 >>> Subject: Re: [Audacity-quality] changes in Resample code >>> >>> T hanks for checking, Rob. Should also be fixed for any of the var-rate. >> >> I tried exporting with a time-track & libsamplerate but the spectrogram of the result showed very high artefact levels -- I'd expect this should be libsamplerate's best quality and therefore low artefact levels. This was after a make clean so I'm fairly sure that my build was true -- can anyone else confirm this behaviour? >> > > Did you reset your Audacity preferences before this test? If not, > because libsoxr was using the same keys as libsamplerate, libsamplerate > could be getting the pref values set for libsoxr. > > (That's why I also made the change to have libsoxr use distinct > keys/defaults for its prefs. Henceforth, each resampler gets its own set > of prefs.) So how do I (as a user) know which resampler is being used? The latest Mac nightly About Audacity > Build Information shows libresample and libsoxr both "enabled". I can't find anything in Prefs where I can choose which one to use. -- Bill |