Re: [Audacity-devel] Modular requires 2 more dlls
A free multi-track audio editor and recorder
Brought to you by:
aosiniao
From: James C. <cr...@in...> - 2008-05-28 21:19:40
|
Leland wrote: > Quoting Vaughan Johnson <va...@au...>: > > >> That's a pain, and why a lot of people are still linking MSVC libs >> statically (especially with this goofy "manifest" stuff in VC8). We >> could consider going back to linking VC statically, if wx doesn't >> require using VC DLLs to build/run wx DLLs. I don't have time to look at >> that right now, but we need only wx as DLLs for the module support, right? > Unfortunately, when wx builds, it builds against the VC DLLs too so we'd be back > to having custom VS projects if we wanted to make wx build against VS static > libs. > > Leland > As we're O.K. with a Audacity coming in multiple parts, providing the MSVC libs too and a manifest file doesn't seem to be a material problem. Or am I missing the issue? Where this does make a difference is with redistributing debug builds (if the whole lot is debug). In that case we can't re-dist the debug MSVC libs - but then the debug build is only really of use to developers who will have it already, so I don't think it's an issue there either. --James. |