Re: [Audacity-devel] web site hiding of email addresses
A free multi-track audio editor and recorder
Brought to you by:
aosiniao
From: Gale A. <ga...@au...> - 2008-02-16 20:15:23
|
| From Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman <bu...@bu...> | Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:15:25 -0200 | Subject: [Audacity-devel] web site hiding of email addresses > Vaughan Johnson wrote: > | Strictly speaking, the obfuscator doesn't make it unextractable. It's > | just re-encoding it so if one wrote a bot to be smart enough to decode > | hex and decimal characters, they'd be recognizable as email addresses. > | But probably most bots aren't that smart. > > Actually, it's quite common that email harvesters URL-decode (typical > hex-encoding) the whole html source. The best, so far, is to use javascript > to output the email address to js-enabled agents (i.e real browsers, > USUALLY), or output images with some level of captcha-ness. > > What I do? I just replace @ and . with things like [AT] and [DOT]... > with different kinds of variations. Replacing characters that define email addresses with other ones is what I tend to in the Wiki too, but I'm not that keen on it because you still have a minority of non-savvy users who take what is there literally and then find it won't work as an email address. Generally I think mailto links are better, if there is some additional security that can defeat most of the bots. We could I suppose name the address, replacing @ with "_AT_" or whatever and explain what to do in hover text. At any rate, the spam filters on the -feedback list are fairly good (the same as -help list had with a few extras) and spam on the -help list was not a very significant problem, despite naming the list explicitly on the page. Gale |