Re: [Audacity-devel] New experimental binaries available

[Dominic M. <do...@au...>]

On Dec 31, 2005, at 2:27 PM, Leland Lucius wrote:
>>
>> I second this.  This is a perfect time for a big check-in:
>> relatively
>> soon after a release.
>>
>>
> Should I do the "branch" thing that Richard suggested or should they
> just go into HEAD?

Go ahead and check into HEAD unless any changes would result in  
breaking an existing feature with no obvious fix available.

As Wikipedia suggests: be bold.  90% of the stuff checked in will be  
great, and the remaining 10% we can either fix, or if necessary  
change back.

- Dominic


> Leland
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through  
> log files
> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD  
> SPLUNK!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Audacity-devel mailing list
> Aud...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-devel
>