Re: [Audacity-devel] [Fwd: Re: [Audacity-help] Re: Buzz when exporting to mp3 or wav]
A free multi-track audio editor and recorder
Brought to you by:
aosiniao
From: Dominic M. <do...@mi...> - 2004-01-05 20:00:47
|
Markus Meyer wrote: > These are the infos for my system: > > [markus@markus markus]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep "model name" > model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.26GHz > > [markus@markus markus]$ gcc --version > gcc (GCC) 3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5) > > I never had a similar problem with any program I wrote so I'm totally > lost on what may cause this. I've seen this before. I'll try compiling your program with gcc 3 on a P4 at work and figure out what's going on. Could you see if removing optimization fixes all resampling problems in Audacity, too? - Dominic > > Markus > > Am Mon, den 05.01.2004 schrieb Dominic Mazzoni um 13:04: > >>Markus Meyer wrote: >> >>>The output I get is below (note how it reports 'nan' for some samples): >>> >>>[markus@markus libresample]$ tests/testresample >>>resampling 1024 samples of silence >>>used 1024 output samples >>>number of output samples = 6145 >>>sum of output samples = nan >>>some example samples: >>>dst[42] = nan >>>dst[43] = 0.000000 >>>dst[44] = 0.000000 >>>dst[45] = 0.000000 >>>dst[46] = 0.000000 >>>dst[47] = 0.000000 >>>dst[48] = nan >>>dst[49] = 0.000000 >>>dst[50] = 0.000000 >>>dst[51] = 0.000000 >>>[markus@markus libresample]$ >> >>On my machine: >> >> > tests/testresample >>resampling 1024 samples of silence >>used 1024 output samples >>number of output samples = 6145 >>sum of output samples = 0.000000 >>some example samples: >>dst[-1] = 0.000000 >>dst[0] = 0.000000 >>dst[1] = 0.000000 >>dst[2] = 0.000000 >>dst[3] = 0.000000 >>dst[4] = 0.000000 >>dst[5] = 0.000000 >>dst[6] = 0.000000 >>dst[7] = 0.000000 >>dst[8] = 0.000000 >> >>I'm using gcc 2.96 (RH 7.x) on an Athlon 1.2 GHz. I also have >>access to a G4, and at work a Pentium III, Pentium IV, Athlon XP, >>and more. What processor and compiler do you have? >> >>BTW, definitely test without optimization, or with -O instead of >>-O2. I'll bet that will fix it. Of course, since that source >>file contains the main inner loop, it will also slow down >>resampling, so that's obviously not the final solution. >> >>- Dominic >> >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------- >>This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. >>Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's >>Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. >>Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click >>_______________________________________________ >>Audacity-devel mailing list >>Aud...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-devel > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. > Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's > Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. > Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Audacity-devel mailing list > Aud...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-devel |