Re: [Arianne-general] Object classes

[Ulrich E. <Doo...@kn...>]

Thursday 08 February 2001 18:15 AD, MIGUEL ANGEL BLANCH LARDIN wrote
< > < >  - what is my gain/loss in height ?
< > < It is related to Metabolism, that I have forgotten to add. :)
< > I didn=B4t mean growing or something like that, I meant goin up/down
< > a slope or stairs.
<
< Would you mind to explain?
< I really don't understand the question.
< Also my reply I understood weigth instead of heigth.
<

If you move in one direction it could mean that you go up the stairs.
Then not only your xy changes but z too.

The intent of all the stuff I posted was to propose some test-cases:
if you can easily and elegantly program these cases, your design was well=
=20
done, if you have to do some awkward things that will easily break if som=
eone=20
tries to change it, you failed.
 The main problem in programming the RP-stuff is when more than one objec=
t is=20
involved in an action. For simple actions, you can always define an activ=
e=20
and one or more passive objects. The action could then go into one of the=
=20
active object=B4s member-functions.

uli