Re: [Arianne-general] Level of detail (was Re:RP work)

[MIGUEL A. B. L. <x51...@fe...>]

> Ok, here it is as I did it so far.
> I know I freaked out a bit with the animals(especially the birds).
> But I am a biologist. :)

:)
Now we have to look for a way of being able to modify it. 
CVS is great but as most of you don't have CVS account. 
Perhaps a FTP would be enough, but most sites don't allow such a tree 
dir.

> I think the part that needs work is the item subtree
> ObjectHierarchy/non-living/solid/man-made/item

I think that we have only to work on basic elements, so that more 
complex one should be done using the basic ones. This approach is very 
flexible, but it has the drawback of an insane increase on number of 
objects.

Another option is to increase a bit the complexity of the basic 
objects, Ex: instead of small pieces to build walls, we could have 
blocks of walls.