Re: [Arianne-devel] RuleManager

[Miguel A. B. L. <mig...@ho...>]

>well, these interfaces were planned as a logical start for another ruleset. 
>The interface way is the most elegant way, it does not block stuff for 
>further development (using (abstract) base classes do this some times). A 
>good example are the List, Map, Set and Iterator interfaces, same "we dont 
>want to enforce a base class" idea.
>
>If we do not plan to implement another ruleset these can be removed, but I 
>remember that Ragnar wanted to develop an alternative one. If it is still 
>an option these interfaces should not be replaced by classes.

My "problem" is that the ruleset idea is a bit incompatible with the API at 
Server, so we need to choose one of them( API or rulesets ). I will keep 
with it as it is now, but we need to fix it ASAP.
I won't remove it by now unless the problem start to get important.

I am completing API at Client.