Re: AW: [Arianne-devel] Arianne new design - Codename Ulises -

[Drew P. V. <dv...@in...>]

While some like the syntax of pascal that is to be argued.

Scripting languages are commonly expected to support an event driven
structure and usually keep quite a bit of internal state information for
careful exposure. Pascal would need a bit of work for this. I'm not saying
Lua is a better choice. I do not know, as I've never used it, but Pascal
is not the best choice.

Regards,
Drew Vogel


On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, [iso-8859-1] Wizard wrote:

>When making a car its easier to use some-one else's motor, right? Same
>applies, methinks.
>
>That and, politely, Pascal is the.. illegitimate offspring of C and
>BASIC, having some advantages of either but not all the advantages of
>either, either! Although, I am just a tad provincial over C++, so I
>recognise no one else may agree with me!
>
>Wizard
>
> --- Gabriel Mazetto <br...@te...> wrote:
>> We can create a script language :)
>> Why use an existent if we can create one?
>>
>> I'm my opinion we need to make an "pascal" based scripting language.
>> Why? It's becouse pascal is fast, easy to learn and have a good code
>> structure and we can use a lot of Highlight Code Tools :)
>> Here is an example (pascal for scripting and .ini based for creating
>> itens!):
>> [ITEM i_torch]
>> NAME=
>> COLOR=
>> WEIGHT=
>> TYPE=
>> ...
>> begin // Here begin the Code Scripting
>> ... (the code here)
>> end
>>
>>
>
>
>http://www.sold.com.au - SOLD.com.au
>- Find yourself a bargain!
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>Welcome to geek heaven.
>http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>_______________________________________________
>Arianne-devel mailing list
>Ari...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arianne-devel
>