From: Michael R. <mr...@us...> - 2004-09-13 15:43:14
|
Hi Stefan, > > > I think that maybe a better solution is to have a > > > single CD demuxer, so that a single demuxer can handle any Audio CD, PCM > > > or DTS or AC3. > > > > Actually I'd personally go the other way. A single dts demuxer that > > handles raw dts, dts audio cds and dts in wav. That way the sync word > > searching etc. can be common between all three. The same would apply > > to ac3 as well. > > I also think this is a better solution. > Already when writing this it felt a bit redundant to have the code both > in demux_wav and in "my" demuxer, especially since this works: > > xine file.wav#demux:dtscd > > I can look into merging what's currently in demux_wav and in my > demux_dtscd into one demuxer. > What would be the best name for this demuxer? demux_dtsraw? demux_dts? Since we already have demux_ac3, demux_dts would fit. Btw, demux_ac3 does handle AC3 on CDs, but not in WAVs, right? Michael -- panic("Aarggh: attempting to free lock with active wait queue - shoot Andy"); 2.0.38 /usr/src/linux/fs/locks.c |