From: Michael R. <mr...@us...> - 2004-08-29 15:23:54
|
Hi James, > > I certainly appreciate you trying to improve these DVD MRLs, but I am not > > sure this is a good solution, because > > a) it breaks MRLs that worked before > > ("xine dvd:/path/to/image/" will not work any more) > > and I fear this will cost us a lot of explaining on xine-user > > b) it is not conforming to the MRL grammar, because this clearly requires > > /dvd.img to be an absolute path in dvd:/dvd.img > > > > I would still favour the idea discussed here: > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=7519844 > > It's just that noone took the time to implement that yet. I think leaving > > out the "?title=2&part=4" for now would serve as a good interim solution. > > > > Sorry for my complaints. > > Having the last / or not has caught out so many people, that I think we > have to go with the idea that the last / does not matter, so it works > with or without it. That is what I am trying to do, and if you have > found a case where it does not work, we should fix it. I completely agree with that. Depending on this slash is braindead. > I certainly do not like the dvd.img/2 (meaning title 2) method. > It is too ambiguous. But it is what fits best into the grammar and it is what we always had. Besides, the ':' does not make it any less ambiguous, since there might be an image file named "dvd.img:1.2" as well as a file "dvd.img/2". Either one would work in one solution and fail in the other. Michael -- "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown |