From: Daniel Caujolle-B. <seg...@cl...> - 2003-11-05 16:05:21
|
Le mer 05/11/2003 =E0 05:03, R. Bernstein a =E9crit : > I'm curious what the size of xine-lib would be if it didn't have the > copies. My guess is 50%. >=20 > In such a survey you might list the various plugins and allow a > person to select "always use", "frequently use", "sometimes use", > "infrequently use", "never use". >=20 > Also it might also be interesting to ask which of these libraries are > installed anyway on the persons system. But if everyone has libmad > installed and knows it, and depending the results on your original > question, it might suggest what to do. It seems you're missing the point, an important one: xine should make dependencies low as possible, that's one of the most important rules, maybe the one, as user view. Also, are you trying to told us that a user who want to play some streams, various streams, is going to do that on a 500Mb HD disk space?. Multimedia playback has requirements, and users know that. I NEVER read any user complain about the size of the lib, never, even ones with low end platforms. This thread just going steril and pointless. As Siggi and me told already told, using internal libs by default is right, if someone wants to use external ones, that's up to him. --=20 73's de Daniel "Der Schreckliche", F1RMB. -=3D- Daniel Caujolle-Bert -=3D- seg...@cl... -= =3D- -=3D- http://naboo.homelinux.org -=3D- |