From: R. B. <ro...@pa...> - 2003-10-17 14:09:05
|
James Stembridge writes: > > Hope it gets sorted out. Interesting to me that the approach was not > > to sync (or finish the sync) and then look to see if it fixed, but fix > > in local copies first, then sync and possibly add a patch if it still > > needed. > > No, that's not what I did, how can you say if I did or didn't check > ffmpeg CVS before trying to fix it myself? Sorry. You didn't mention looking at ffmpeg CVS so I assumed you didn't. If you did, keep up the good work! > Or are you suggesting we > should blindly sync every time there is a problem? What I personally do when I discover a problem in software I'm using is check the latest version, and look over the NEWS or Changelog to see if there might be something related. But sure, creating a patch in a local version may be expedient to understand what's wrong. > > I checked ffmpeg CVS, which also had the problem. I worked out a fix and > committed it to our copy, and was in the process of sending the patch to > ffmpeg-devel when I realised that the fix might actually have side > effects (damn I hate them, we should all code in Haskell instead ;) > Rather than trying to figure it out and check other files I decided to > sleep on it and come back to it later. In due course I will fix the > problem properly and ensure the appropriate fix is sent upstream. Okay, thanks for the explanation. Keep up the good work. |