Re: [xine-devel] xine amd64 patches

[Adrian S. <ad...@su...>]

On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Michael Roitzsch wrote:
> > > The problem is that pointers have a size of long (64bit) instead of
> > > int on 64bit architectures. So either a (long) cast should be used
> > > instead of the (int) or maybe posix_memalign() or memalign() should
> > > be used to allocated the memory.
>
> Ooops, I didn't know that int is 32bit wide on AMD64.

(on alpha and s390x also)

> > So I changed simply the casts to long. That works here, but upcoming
> > 128bit machines may break it again ;)
>
> uintptr_t should be our friend here. This is always as wide as a
> pointer. Could you try, if this works for AMD64?

I did not tested it here in special, but it works in general.

bye
adrian

**********************************************************************
Adrian Schroeter
SuSE AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, 90429 Nuernberg, Germany
email: ad...@su...   (672 mails already received today.)