Re: [xine-devel] #ifdef LOG and xine->verbosity >= xxx change proposal [sample]

[Thibaut M. <tma...@no...>]

On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 21:41, Guenter Bartsch wrote:
> hallo daniel,
> 
> > > > 	Anyway, verbosity policy usage is up to UI, so i don't see any
> > > > complication here. UI can permit some numeric or "verbosity level
> > > > names".
> > > 
> > > how could a frontend decide how the xine engine interprets verbosity
> > > values?
> > > 
> > > anyway, switching from a numerical comparison (which is the current
> > > implementation) to a bit vector intepretation would be an api change
> > > (not api syntax but api semantics)
> > > 
> > 
> > 	Okay okay, i will not spend more time with that. The port patch will
> > even not go through trashcan.

what ? crazy Daniel ! ;)
I dont care about the api change, there is no serious roadmap, how many
beta or pre will follow beta12 ? I vote for your patch.


> humm, do i understand you correctly here: you want to discard the whole
> patch? in that case i'd apply the good parts of it :-)

hmm, where is the patch ? ;)


> guenter

thibaut