Re: [xine-user] priorities for 0.9.10

[Morten N. <mo...@ni...>]

Bartlomiej Muryn wrote:
> On Sunday 05 May 2002 20:38, Guenter Bartsch wrote:
> 
>>Hi folks,
>>
>>wow. the public libxine xine api state is much worse than I thought. I
>>have been working on cleaning it up, but I'll need more time for this one.
>>My goal is an interface which is consistent and also a true abstraction
>>layer so it will be easy to use and also less-likely to break when there
>>are changes in the xine engine.
>>
>>also, documentation is very important - but at this point there is hardly
>>any and I must confess I don't remember the meaning of everything so I
>>have to dig into the code to find out what it was good for.
>>
>>so, don't hold your breath for 0.9.10 - although I still expect it to be
>>released some time this week
> 
> That's fine for me:)))
> Just say - the docs changes will be huge one (re-translation will be needed) 
> or just correction and insertion of new features (so translation can be just 
> updated)?
> 

talking of next xine... I posted an url to a diff to get rid of most of 
the compiler warnings in xine-lib...
I haven't heard any comments on it, and wondered if anyone have looked 
at it, or even applied it/checked it in?