From: Bastien N. <ha...@ha...> - 2002-08-17 01:24:19
|
On Sat, 2002-08-17 at 02:05, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Sat, 2002-08-17 at 01:51, be...@us... wrote: > > Am Samstag 17 August 2002 01:31 schrieb Bastien Nocera: > > > > > > > > And file://home/user/video.vob is the correct mrl and not > > > > file:///home/user/video.vob > > > > > > Wrong. > > > > > > scheme + colon + two slashes for the protocol, then either hostname, = or > > > user, password, hostname, or nothing. Then path. > > > > > > scheme: > > > file:// > > > path: > > > /home/user/video.vob > > > > > > which gives: > > > file:///home/user/video.vob > > > > > > file://home/user/video.vob isn't a correct URI. > >=20 > > No I think you are wrong. > > Java for example uses file:// =20 > > If you enter file://home/user/index.html in Opera it will show the file > > if you enter file:///home/user/index.html it will change it to=20 > > file://localhost/home/user/index.html > >=20 > > And I actually believe Sun that they got it right. >=20 > Show me drafts and RFC, not broken and semi-broken, or not so-broken > applications. >=20 > http://www.w3.org/Addressing/URL/4_1_File.html and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-uri/2000Jun/0656.html too > What would be right: > file://localhost/home/user/video.vob > What is right but with "unexpected and possibly harmful results" > (hostname omitted): Whee, typo-land. > file:///localhost/homes/user/video.vob should read: file:///home/user/video.vob --=20 /Bastien Nocera http://hadess.net |