From: Miguel F. <mi...@ce...> - 2002-08-11 12:46:49
|
Hi Robin, On Sat, 2002-08-10 at 22:56, KAY Robin wrote: > That aside, the performance of 0.9.13 is noticeably poorer than that of > 0.9.10. DVD playback has become jerky and it borders on unbearable -_-. > I wonder if this is indicative of increasing complexity in the xine > core. No problem for gigahertz Lintel users but for us owners of > "overpriced- unix- workstations- which- are- easily- outperformed- by- > commodity- machines- half- their- price", it's a bit of a drag ^_-. From > memory, the number of skipped frames has about doubled. Half of their price? no... commodity machines are not that expensive! :) I don't recall any big change on xine core that would affect performance. In fact, i didn't experience any difference within the recent versions and my home machine isn't a top gigahertz one. you will need to help us tracking which change impacted performance for you. 0.9.10 to 0.9.13 is a quite long time window, so you could start finding out which exact version this was introduced, and then go to cvslog searching... > about it. Weird! The dvdnav configure and build process is still broken > too -_-. I remember getting an email from one of the dvdnav developers > saying they would look into it but I haven't heard anything since. xine-dvdnav is part of our cvs tree now, you may want to give it a try... > There's something broken in the audio driver too. xine's internal checks > report that the sample counter is going backwards. sample counter going backwards? which message is that? Does it happen with any kind of stream? regards, Miguel |