Re: [xine-user] Direct Show Support

[Rick H. <ri...@ku...>]

I belive Mike found a way to read/write to the video encoder a 32bit
word at a time.  That's probably just as slow, if not slower, than  
reencoding to mpeg.  It may be useful for screenshots though (that's
probably its purpose anyway).  I don't have time to play with it
unfortunately.

On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 03:34:46PM +0100, Harm van der Heijden wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 03:19:45PM +0100, LAURENT Ludovic (ITG/IBS) wrote:
> > I have Divx+ working at home, but I have read that you must have a H+ (not
> > DXR3) revision B, it's exactly what I have and that works quite well, but
> > the DS filter is called H+ YUV renderer, so I don't know if it convert
> > on-the-fly to decoded divx to mpeg1 I-frame only or Make some magic
> > operation to send directly YUV to the board.
> 
> This discussion pops up every now and again on the sigma designs newsgroups,
> but last time I skimmed those discussions (well, the tiny bits of 
> rational argument between the flames and the itdontworkdamnits) there was
> no consensus of whether it made mpeg1 I frames or pushed raw YUV to the
> encoder.
> 
> Most people, however, are very skeptical of the possibility of pushing raw YUV
> (at least at the data rates needed for playback) to the encoder on H+. 
> 
> I also tend to believe the people who report they need at least 700 MHz PIII
> or Athlons to get proper output at 640x480; that's more or less what we
> get with dxr3enc.
> 
> Harm
>  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xine-user mailing list
> xin...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xine-user

-- 
Rick (ri...@ku...)
http://dxr3.sourceforge.net
http://rsub.sourceforge.net

I think the slogan of the fansubbers puts
it best: "Cheaper than crack, and lots more fun."