Menu
▾
▴
webadmin-list — Webmin users mailing list
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
(39) |
Feb
(258) |
Mar
(396) |
Apr
(439) |
May
(337) |
Jun
(351) |
Jul
(296) |
Aug
(205) |
Sep
(328) |
Oct
(174) |
Nov
(252) |
Dec
(172) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(213) |
Feb
(194) |
Mar
(337) |
Apr
(314) |
May
(373) |
Jun
(522) |
Jul
(417) |
Aug
(471) |
Sep
(486) |
Oct
(422) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(299) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(354) |
Feb
(310) |
Mar
(379) |
Apr
(349) |
May
(388) |
Jun
(218) |
Jul
(368) |
Aug
(340) |
Sep
(222) |
Oct
(176) |
Nov
(214) |
Dec
(211) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(221) |
Feb
(187) |
Mar
(190) |
Apr
(211) |
May
(114) |
Jun
(136) |
Jul
(124) |
Aug
(178) |
Sep
(244) |
Oct
(203) |
Nov
(215) |
Dec
(156) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(334) |
Feb
(268) |
Mar
(302) |
Apr
(309) |
May
(192) |
Jun
(288) |
Jul
(273) |
Aug
(215) |
Sep
(318) |
Oct
(347) |
Nov
(226) |
Dec
(265) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(192) |
Feb
(227) |
Mar
(311) |
Apr
(197) |
May
(224) |
Jun
(213) |
Jul
(285) |
Aug
(227) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(209) |
Nov
(169) |
Dec
(174) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(149) |
Feb
(112) |
Mar
(144) |
Apr
(204) |
May
(178) |
Jun
(155) |
Jul
(246) |
Aug
(221) |
Sep
(187) |
Oct
(262) |
Nov
(163) |
Dec
(158) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(256) |
Feb
(318) |
Mar
(307) |
Apr
(237) |
May
(202) |
Jun
(105) |
Jul
(131) |
Aug
(107) |
Sep
(153) |
Oct
(165) |
Nov
(159) |
Dec
(189) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(202) |
Feb
(150) |
Mar
(151) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(56) |
Jun
(115) |
Jul
(103) |
Aug
(150) |
Sep
(141) |
Oct
(187) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(105) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(128) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(64) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(92) |
Jun
(91) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(145) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(69) |
Nov
(98) |
Dec
(149) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(44) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(78) |
May
(138) |
Jun
(132) |
Jul
(151) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(107) |
Oct
(168) |
Nov
(88) |
Dec
(94) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(51) |
Feb
(153) |
Mar
(141) |
Apr
(102) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(87) |
Aug
(39) |
Sep
(67) |
Oct
(84) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(55) |
Feb
(96) |
Mar
(79) |
Apr
(33) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(57) |
Aug
(76) |
Sep
(39) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(68) |
Dec
(61) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(98) |
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(57) |
May
(58) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(81) |
Nov
(52) |
Dec
(48) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(67) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(92) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(34) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(68) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(63) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(26) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(98) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(62) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(20) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(25) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(36) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
|
Aug
(17) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2025 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(10) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: David L. <da...@up...> - 2023-05-12 10:19:00
|
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>if it helps anyone else, I was able to deal with this using the
"up" line on the interface entry in the interfaces config<br>
</p>
<p>iface enp7s0 inet static<br>
address 172.16.1.154<br>
netmask 255.255.255.0<br>
network 172.16.1.0<br>
mtu 9000<br>
offload-tx off<br>
offload-sg off<br>
offload-tso off<br>
up ip route change 172.16.1.0/24 dev enp7s0 proto kernel
scope link src 172.16.1.154 quickack 1</p>
<p>This was an iscsi interface, standard acks were killing it with
high i/o delay, while it did not eliminate the delay it is
considerably lower</p>
<p> <br>
</p>
<p> <br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/11/2023 6:53 PM, Jamie Cameron
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:011...@us...">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p>You can edit static routes in Webmin at Networking ->
Network Configuration, but there's no field for special options
like "quickack" unfortunately.. </p>
<p>On 11/May/2023 06:54 David Lawley <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:da...@up..."><da...@up...></a>
wrote ..
</p>
<blockquote type="cite">
<p>disregard, doing some research after asking , seems to be a
popular question</p>
<p>for me is was pretty simple adding another line to the
interfaces file for that interface</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p> <br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/11/2023 8:25 AM, David Lawley
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:0b7...@up...">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
<p>Was working with "ack"s on an interface and adding quickack
1 to the routing like so,</p>
<p>ip route change 172.16.1.0/24 dev enp7s0 proto kernel scope
link src 172.16.1.151 quickack 1</p>
<p>But on reboot the configuration is back to before without
the quickack 1</p>
<p>Did not see anywhere in webmin routing and gateway to add
this.</p>
<p>Is Webmin overwriting this config on boot? Anyway to make
this stick?<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
A quick word on style. I have none.
I have casual way of talking and writing, and a strange sense of humour.
I also tend to use random pop-culture references a lot, but often in ways that make no sense.
If this is a problem you are entitled to a refund of the money you paid to me to write this... ;)</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
<br>
<fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre">-
Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="reply_mail.cgi?new=1&to=webadmin%2Dlist%40lists%2Esourceforge%2Enet" moz-do-not-send="true">web...@li...</a>
To remove yourself from this list, go to
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list" moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
A quick word on style. I have none.
I have casual way of talking and writing, and a strange sense of humour.
I also tend to use random pop-culture references a lot, but often in ways that make no sense.
If this is a problem you are entitled to a refund of the money you paid to me to write this... ;)</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
<br>
<fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">-
Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:web...@li...">web...@li...</a>
To remove yourself from this list, go to
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list">http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
A quick word on style. I have none.
I have casual way of talking and writing, and a strange sense of humour.
I also tend to use random pop-culture references a lot, but often in ways that make no sense.
If this is a problem you are entitled to a refund of the money you paid to me to write this... ;)</pre>
</body>
</html>
|
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2023-05-11 23:08:08
|
You can edit static routes in Webmin at Networking -> Network Configuration, but there's no field for special options like "quickack" unfortunately.. On 11/May/2023 06:54 David Lawley <da...@up...> wrote .. disregard, doing some research after asking , seems to be a popular question for me is was pretty simple adding another line to the interfaces file for that interface On 5/11/2023 8:25 AM, David Lawley wrote: Was working with "ack"s on an interface and adding quickack 1 to the routing like so, ip route change 172.16.1.0/24 dev enp7s0 proto kernel scope link src 172.16.1.151 quickack 1 But on reboot the configuration is back to before without the quickack 1 Did not see anywhere in webmin routing and gateway to add this. Is Webmin overwriting this config on boot? Anyway to make this stick? -- A quick word on style. I have none. I have casual way of talking and writing, and a strange sense of humour. I also tend to use random pop-culture references a lot, but often in ways that make no sense. If this is a problem you are entitled to a refund of the money you paid to me to write this... ;) - Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li... To remove yourself from this list, go to http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list -- A quick word on style. I have none. I have casual way of talking and writing, and a strange sense of humour. I also tend to use random pop-culture references a lot, but often in ways that make no sense. If this is a problem you are entitled to a refund of the money you paid to me to write this... ;) |
|
From: David L. <da...@up...> - 2023-05-11 13:54:23
|
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>disregard, doing some research after asking , seems to be a
popular question</p>
<p>for me is was pretty simple adding another line to the interfaces
file for that interface</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p> <br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/11/2023 8:25 AM, David Lawley
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:0b7...@up...">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p>Was working with "ack"s on an interface and adding quickack 1
to the routing like so,</p>
<p>ip route change 172.16.1.0/24 dev enp7s0 proto kernel scope
link src 172.16.1.151 quickack 1</p>
<p>But on reboot the configuration is back to before without the
quickack 1</p>
<p>Did not see anywhere in webmin routing and gateway to add this.</p>
<p>Is Webmin overwriting this config on boot? Anyway to make this
stick?<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
A quick word on style. I have none.
I have casual way of talking and writing, and a strange sense of humour.
I also tend to use random pop-culture references a lot, but often in ways that make no sense.
If this is a problem you are entitled to a refund of the money you paid to me to write this... ;)</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
<br>
<fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">-
Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:web...@li...">web...@li...</a>
To remove yourself from this list, go to
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list">http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
A quick word on style. I have none.
I have casual way of talking and writing, and a strange sense of humour.
I also tend to use random pop-culture references a lot, but often in ways that make no sense.
If this is a problem you are entitled to a refund of the money you paid to me to write this... ;)</pre>
</body>
</html>
|
|
From: David L. <da...@up...> - 2023-05-11 12:40:48
|
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Was working with "ack"s on an interface and adding quickack 1 to
the routing like so,</p>
<p>ip route change 172.16.1.0/24 dev enp7s0 proto kernel scope link
src 172.16.1.151 quickack 1</p>
<p>But on reboot the configuration is back to before without the
quickack 1</p>
<p>Did not see anywhere in webmin routing and gateway to add this.</p>
<p>Is Webmin overwriting this config on boot? Anyway to make this
stick?<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
A quick word on style. I have none.
I have casual way of talking and writing, and a strange sense of humour.
I also tend to use random pop-culture references a lot, but often in ways that make no sense.
If this is a problem you are entitled to a refund of the money you paid to me to write this... ;)</pre>
</body>
</html>
|
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2023-03-16 02:11:32
|
Oops I messed up the .htaccess file! This is fixed now .. On 15/Mar/2023 02:32 Ilia <mailing-list@ilia.engineer> wrote .. Hello, Joho! You're right. I'm also seeing this. Jamie, www.webmin.com should always redirect to webmin.com. On Wed, 15 Mar 2023, 09:34 Joaquim Homrighausen, <jo...@we...> wrote: Hi there Just a quick note to let you know that, for me, https://webmin.com looks quite different to https://www.webmin.com. -joho - Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li... To remove yourself from this list, go to http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list |
|
From: Ilia <mai...@il...> - 2023-03-15 09:55:51
|
Hello, Joho! You're right. I'm also seeing this. Jamie, *www.webmin.com <http://www.webmin.com>* should always redirect to *webmin.com <http://webmin.com>*. On Wed, 15 Mar 2023, 09:34 Joaquim Homrighausen, <jo...@we...> wrote: > > Hi there > > Just a quick note to let you know that, for me, https://webmin.com looks > quite different to https://www.webmin.com. > > > -joho > > > > > - > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at > web...@li... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list > |
|
From: Joaquim H. <jo...@we...> - 2023-03-15 07:32:37
|
Hi there Just a quick note to let you know that, for me, https://webmin.com looks quite different to https://www.webmin.com. -joho |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2023-02-24 00:28:35
|
On 23/Feb/2023 00:17 Joaquim Homrighausen <jo...@we...> wrote .. > On 2023-02-23 06:12, Jamie Cameron wrote: > > That's odd - did you try clicking Refresh Modules on the left menu? > > Yes I did. And then I went down to "unused modules" and clicked on it > and it "worked", but it did display the warning about the missing Perl > package. Ok, that's kind of expected - the list of visible modules is only updated when you refresh, so if PostgreSQL wasn't installed when Webmin was, this can happen. |
|
From: Joaquim H. <jo...@we...> - 2023-02-23 08:18:05
|
On 2023-02-23 06:12, Jamie Cameron wrote: > That's odd - did you try clicking Refresh Modules on the left menu? Yes I did. And then I went down to "unused modules" and clicked on it and it "worked", but it did display the warning about the missing Perl package. -joho |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2023-02-23 05:28:50
|
On 22/Feb/2023 02:46 Joaquim Homrighausen <jo...@we...> wrote .. > > Any reason why I can't have Webmin use tar.gz for the pgsql backups? > > Or specify parameters to pg_dump? Good point, we really should add support for compressed backups in PostgreSQL. I'll look into this .. |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2023-02-23 05:27:13
|
On 22/Feb/2023 01:06 Joaquim Homrighausen <jo...@we...> wrote .. > > Does the PostgreSQL module not support the %Y%m%d "macros" in the > "Backup files directory" field? This works beautifully for MySQL backups > and is very convenient. It does, but you have to turn on the "Do strftime substitution of backup destinations?" option on the module configuration page. > Also ... > > It took me a while to figure out why the PostgreSQL module did not show > as active, installing the correct Perl module did the trick. > > But what's interesting is that when I clicked on it, under unused > modules, it could talk to PostgreSQL just fine. It just showed me a > warning that backups could not be made due to a missing Perl module. > > Perhaps that handling could be improved. That's odd - did you try clicking Refresh Modules on the left menu? |
|
From: Joaquim H. <jo...@we...> - 2023-02-22 10:47:01
|
Any reason why I can't have Webmin use tar.gz for the pgsql backups? Or specify parameters to pg_dump? -joho |
|
From: Joaquim H. <jo...@we...> - 2023-02-22 09:44:06
|
On the first, yes indeed: "Do strftime substitution of backup destinations?". My bad. On 2023-02-22 10:06, Joaquim Homrighausen wrote: > > Does the PostgreSQL module not support the %Y%m%d "macros" in the > "Backup files directory" field? This works beautifully for MySQL > backups and is very convenient. > > > Also ... > > It took me a while to figure out why the PostgreSQL module did not > show as active, installing the correct Perl module did the trick. > > But what's interesting is that when I clicked on it, under unused > modules, it could talk to PostgreSQL just fine. It just showed me a > warning that backups could not be made due to a missing Perl module. > > Perhaps that handling could be improved. |
|
From: Joaquim H. <jo...@we...> - 2023-02-22 09:22:37
|
Does the PostgreSQL module not support the %Y%m%d "macros" in the "Backup files directory" field? This works beautifully for MySQL backups and is very convenient. Also ... It took me a while to figure out why the PostgreSQL module did not show as active, installing the correct Perl module did the trick. But what's interesting is that when I clicked on it, under unused modules, it could talk to PostgreSQL just fine. It just showed me a warning that backups could not be made due to a missing Perl module. Perhaps that handling could be improved. -joho |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2023-01-24 05:37:02
|
On 23/Jan/2023 13:57 Michael Romagnoli <we...@ro...> wrote .. > > Here is an odd, but small bug when using Usermin Mail: > > When you hit "reply", normally a "re:" appears in the subject line. This happens, > but not always. If the subject starts with "re" (capitalized or lowercase), the > "re:" for the reply does not appear! > > If I were to guess, there is a test case for whether or not there is a reply, and > to only place the "re:" if "re" is not already there. Maybe test for "re:" as > whether or not to apply an "re:" for the subject line? That's just a guess on > my part, though..... Thanks for pointing this out! I'll fix that in the next release .. |
|
From: Michael R. <we...@ro...> - 2023-01-23 21:57:46
|
Here is an odd, but small bug when using Usermin Mail: When you hit "reply", normally a "re:" appears in the subject line. This happens, but not always. If the subject starts with "re" (capitalized or lowercase), the "re:" for the reply does not appear! If I were to guess, there is a test case for whether or not there is a reply, and to only place the "re:" if "re" is not already there. Maybe test for "re:" as whether or not to apply an "re:" for the subject line? That's just a guess on my part, though..... -Mike |
|
From: Buchanan, T. <tbu...@vi...> - 2023-01-22 00:09:19
|
we're good On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 5:37 PM Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> wrote: > Please try again now - I mistakenly didn't upload the 2.013 files after > announcing the release. > > On 20/Jan/2023 05:28 Buchanan, Ted <tbu...@vi...> wrote .. > > I first noticed a problem when in the Webmin interface on one of my Oracle > 8 linux servers. It said an update to 2.012 was available but when I > clicked to update, it gave a 404 error. Then when I clicked the link > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/webadmin/webmin-2.013-1.noarch.rpm, it > took me to https://sourceforge.net/projects/webadmin/files/ and the > latest version was listed as 1.979. When I clicked on the Webmin folders, > 1.979 was the latest folder I could see. I see the same thing now. Now > when I go to https://webmin.com it shows 2.013 is available but when I > click on the RPM link, it takes me to > https://sourceforge.net/projects/webadmin/files/ and the latest file is > listed as 1.851.& nbsp; I do see a folder for 2.013 but no files within. > This is with Firefox from a Fedora 37 workstation. Same thing with google > chrome. Yesterday, the folders eventually populated and I was able to > manually download 2.012 successfully. > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 9:19 PM Jamie Cameron <jca...@we... > <http://reply_mail.cgi?new=1&to=jcameron%40webmin%2Ecom>> wrote: > >> On 19/Jan/2023 07:09 Buchanan, Ted <tbu...@vi... >> <http://reply_mail.cgi?new=1&to=tbuchanan%40vinu%2Eedu>> wrote .. >> >> folders on sourceforge only go up to 1.979 >> >> >> That's odd, I can see the 2.012 version on sourceforge. What URL are you >> looking at? >> >> - >> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at >> web...@li... >> <http://reply_mail.cgi?new=1&to=webadmin%2Dlist%40lists%2Esourceforge%2Enet> >> To remove yourself from this list, go to >> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list >> > > > -- > Ted Buchanan > Senior Systems Administrator - Vincennes University > tbu...@vi... <http://reply_mail.cgi?new=1&to=tbuchanan%40vinu%2Eedu> > > > > - > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at > web...@li... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list > -- Ted Buchanan Senior Systems Administrator - Vincennes University tbu...@vi... |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2023-01-20 22:37:13
|
Please try again now - I mistakenly didn't upload the 2.013 files after announcing the release. On 20/Jan/2023 05:28 Buchanan, Ted <tbu...@vi...> wrote .. I first noticed a problem when in the Webmin interface on one of my Oracle 8 linux servers. It said an update to 2.012 was available but when I clicked to update, it gave a 404 error. Then when I clicked the link http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/webadmin/webmin-2.013-1.noarch.rpm, it took me to https://sourceforge.net/projects/webadmin/files/ and the latest version was listed as 1.979. When I clicked on the Webmin folders, 1.979 was the latest folder I could see. I see the same thing now. Now when I go to https://webmin.com it shows 2.013 is available but when I click on the RPM link, it takes me to https://sourceforge.net/projects/webadmin/files/ and the latest file is listed as 1.851. I do see a folder for 2.013 but no files within. This is with Firefox from a Fedora 37 workstation. Same thing with google chrome. Yesterday, the folders eventually populated and I was able to manually download 2.012 successfully. On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 9:19 PM Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> wrote: On 19/Jan/2023 07:09 Buchanan, Ted <tbu...@vi...> wrote .. folders on sourceforge only go up to 1.979 That's odd, I can see the 2.012 version on sourceforge. What URL are you looking at? - Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li... To remove yourself from this list, go to http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list -- Ted BuchananSenior Systems Administrator - Vincennes Uni...@vi... |
|
From: Buchanan, T. <tbu...@vi...> - 2023-01-20 13:28:39
|
I first noticed a problem when in the Webmin interface on one of my Oracle 8 linux servers. It said an update to 2.012 was available but when I clicked to update, it gave a 404 error. Then when I clicked the link http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/webadmin/webmin-2.013-1.noarch.rpm, it took me to https://sourceforge.net/projects/webadmin/files/ and the latest version was listed as 1.979. When I clicked on the Webmin folders, 1.979 was the latest folder I could see. I see the same thing now. Now when I go to https://webmin.com it shows 2.013 is available but when I click on the RPM link, it takes me to https://sourceforge.net/projects/webadmin/files/ and the latest file is listed as 1.851. I do see a folder for 2.013 but no files within. This is with Firefox from a Fedora 37 workstation. Same thing with google chrome. Yesterday, the folders eventually populated and I was able to manually download 2.012 successfully. On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 9:19 PM Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> wrote: > On 19/Jan/2023 07:09 Buchanan, Ted <tbu...@vi...> wrote .. > > folders on sourceforge only go up to 1.979 > > > That's odd, I can see the 2.012 version on sourceforge. What URL are you > looking at? > > - > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at > web...@li... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list > -- Ted Buchanan Senior Systems Administrator - Vincennes University tbu...@vi... |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2023-01-20 02:19:51
|
On 19/Jan/2023 07:09 Buchanan, Ted <tbu...@vi...> wrote .. folders on sourceforge only go up to 1.979 That's odd, I can see the 2.012 version on sourceforge. What URL are you looking at? |
|
From: Buchanan, T. <tbu...@vi...> - 2023-01-19 15:39:47
|
folders on sourceforge only go up to 1.979 |
|
From: Ilia <mai...@il...> - 2023-01-18 01:13:11
|
> > Another thing I noticed, but perhaps there is a setting I am missing, is > that it seems that users were able to select a theme at one point under > Languages & Themes. On my system, Usermin now only allows a language to be > selected. Modules available in Usermin can be selected on *Webmin ⇾ Usermin Configuration: Available Modules *page. On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 1:33 AM Michael Romagnoli <we...@ro...> wrote: > > A menu being there doesn't bother me....the fact it is permanently open > bothers me. It's a complete mess, with sloppy formatting. > > Point #2 - it's already done on another theme (permanently open) - why > would that be repeated here? The point of the Frame theme, from what I > understood, is for it to be minimalistic. i.e. similar to the original > Usermin theme. > > Point #3 - shouldn't interfaces be flexible to allow users to do what they > want? > > Another thing I noticed, but perhaps there is a setting I am missing, is > that it seems that users were able to select a theme at one point under > Languages & Themes. On my system, Usermin now only allows a language to be > selected. > > On 16/Jan/2023 17:48 Ilia <mailing-list@ilia.engineer> wrote .. > > The best we could do is to add an option to hide the mail tab .. but this > > is a very unusual request! > > > > Why is the left menu for mail bothering you in the first place anyway? > > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 9:35 PM Michael Romagnoli <we...@ro...> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > But then you cannot read mail at all......I just want that obnoxious > list > > > of folders removed from the left. The Authentic theme already does > > > this..... > > > > > > On 16/Jan/2023 13:59 Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> wrote .. > > > > On 16/Jan/2023 09:50 Michael Romagnoli <we...@ro...> wrote > .. > > > > > > > > > > Hey, with the new version of Usermin(1.861), the Frame theme has > been > > > changed > > > > to > > > > > include a rather obnoxious left side bar that contains a list of > all > > > of the mail > > > > > folders plus links.....that doesn't seem to be removable or > changable. > > > > > > > > > > One of the things I've always liked about the Frame theme is that > it > > > is pretty > > > > > similar to the original Usermin theme. No sidebars and stuff like > > > that. > > > > > > > > > > Is it possible to remove this or at least have an option to > customize > > > it so that > > > > > it can be optional rather than forced? > > > > > > > > Yes, we merged some of the old themes in the new Usermin release so > that > > > the list > > > > of mail folders on the left menu is available to all users. However, > you > > > can turn > > > > this off by removing access to the Read Mail module.. > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at > > > web...@li... > > > > To remove yourself from this list, go to > > > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list > > > > > > > > > - > > > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at > > > web...@li... > > > To remove yourself from this list, go to > > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list > > > > > > - > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at > web...@li... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list > |
|
From: Michael R. <we...@ro...> - 2023-01-16 23:32:57
|
A menu being there doesn't bother me....the fact it is permanently open bothers me. It's a complete mess, with sloppy formatting. Point #2 - it's already done on another theme (permanently open) - why would that be repeated here? The point of the Frame theme, from what I understood, is for it to be minimalistic. i.e. similar to the original Usermin theme. Point #3 - shouldn't interfaces be flexible to allow users to do what they want? Another thing I noticed, but perhaps there is a setting I am missing, is that it seems that users were able to select a theme at one point under Languages & Themes. On my system, Usermin now only allows a language to be selected. On 16/Jan/2023 17:48 Ilia <mailing-list@ilia.engineer> wrote .. > The best we could do is to add an option to hide the mail tab .. but this > is a very unusual request! > > Why is the left menu for mail bothering you in the first place anyway? > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 9:35 PM Michael Romagnoli <we...@ro...> > wrote: > > > > > > > But then you cannot read mail at all......I just want that obnoxious list > > of folders removed from the left. The Authentic theme already does > > this..... > > > > On 16/Jan/2023 13:59 Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> wrote .. > > > On 16/Jan/2023 09:50 Michael Romagnoli <we...@ro...> wrote .. > > > > > > > > Hey, with the new version of Usermin(1.861), the Frame theme has been > > changed > > > to > > > > include a rather obnoxious left side bar that contains a list of all > > of the mail > > > > folders plus links.....that doesn't seem to be removable or changable. > > > > > > > > One of the things I've always liked about the Frame theme is that it > > is pretty > > > > similar to the original Usermin theme. No sidebars and stuff like > > that. > > > > > > > > Is it possible to remove this or at least have an option to customize > > it so that > > > > it can be optional rather than forced? > > > > > > Yes, we merged some of the old themes in the new Usermin release so that > > the list > > > of mail folders on the left menu is available to all users. However, you > > can turn > > > this off by removing access to the Read Mail module.. > > > > > > > > > - > > > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at > > web...@li... > > > To remove yourself from this list, go to > > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list > > > > > > - > > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at > > web...@li... > > To remove yourself from this list, go to > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list > > |
|
From: Ilia <mai...@il...> - 2023-01-16 23:22:14
|
The best we could do is to add an option to hide the mail tab .. but this is a very unusual request! Why is the left menu for mail bothering you in the first place anyway? On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 9:35 PM Michael Romagnoli <we...@ro...> wrote: > > > But then you cannot read mail at all......I just want that obnoxious list > of folders removed from the left. The Authentic theme already does > this..... > > On 16/Jan/2023 13:59 Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> wrote .. > > On 16/Jan/2023 09:50 Michael Romagnoli <we...@ro...> wrote .. > > > > > > Hey, with the new version of Usermin(1.861), the Frame theme has been > changed > > to > > > include a rather obnoxious left side bar that contains a list of all > of the mail > > > folders plus links.....that doesn't seem to be removable or changable. > > > > > > One of the things I've always liked about the Frame theme is that it > is pretty > > > similar to the original Usermin theme. No sidebars and stuff like > that. > > > > > > Is it possible to remove this or at least have an option to customize > it so that > > > it can be optional rather than forced? > > > > Yes, we merged some of the old themes in the new Usermin release so that > the list > > of mail folders on the left menu is available to all users. However, you > can turn > > this off by removing access to the Read Mail module.. > > > > > > - > > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at > web...@li... > > To remove yourself from this list, go to > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list > > > - > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at > web...@li... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list > |
|
From: Michael R. <we...@ro...> - 2023-01-16 19:33:50
|
But then you cannot read mail at all......I just want that obnoxious list of folders removed from the left. The Authentic theme already does this..... On 16/Jan/2023 13:59 Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> wrote .. > On 16/Jan/2023 09:50 Michael Romagnoli <we...@ro...> wrote .. > > > > Hey, with the new version of Usermin(1.861), the Frame theme has been changed > to > > include a rather obnoxious left side bar that contains a list of all of the mail > > folders plus links.....that doesn't seem to be removable or changable. > > > > One of the things I've always liked about the Frame theme is that it is pretty > > similar to the original Usermin theme. No sidebars and stuff like that. > > > > Is it possible to remove this or at least have an option to customize it so that > > it can be optional rather than forced? > > Yes, we merged some of the old themes in the new Usermin release so that the list > of mail folders on the left menu is available to all users. However, you can turn > this off by removing access to the Read Mail module.. > > > - > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list |
860 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
